The Terrorist's Best Friend by Robert W. Tracinski -- Capitalism Magazine
Capitalism Magazine > War & Peace > Terrorism  Newsletter | Feed | Support Us | Blog | Search


The Terrorist's Best Friend

by Robert W. Tracinski  (February 25, 2002)

The events of the past few weeks in Israel have offered a timeless lesson on the real cause of terrorism and the real meaning of the "peace process."

The pattern of these events is crystal clear: Yasser Arafat and his Palestinian Authority have escalated their war against Israel, while loudly demanding that Israel renounce "military solutions" and return to the "peace process." It is a brazen attempt to wage an all-out war while urging the victims to disarm themselves.

It is important to grasp the nature of the recent escalation in the Palestinian war effort. A little more than a week ago, an Israeli tank was destroyed when it was lured over a mine made from 80 pounds of powerful C4 explosives -- not exactly a homemade weapon cooked up by disaffected youngsters in a refugee camp. Early this week, a squad of Palestinian militants killed six off-duty soldiers asleep in their bunks at an Israeli checkpoint. This was not a suicide attack, but rather a carefully planned commando raid carried out by the al-Aqsa militia, a branch of Yasser Arafat's own Fatah political faction. Over the past few weeks, Palestinians have also begun pelting Israel with Qassam 2 rockets, which have a range of up to 5 miles and carry a destructive power equivalent to a 122 mm mortar.

All of this comes after the capture of the Karine A, a Palestinian ship caught smuggling $50 million of Iranian military weapons into Gaza. Taken together, all of these events make it clear that the Palestinian "uprising" is an all-out military campaign that is increasingly taking on the character of conventional warfare.

But while the Palestinians treat this like a war, they urge the Israelis to do the opposite. Palestinian official Jibril Rajoub rails: "Not security, not the military, not the siege, and no F-16 fighter planes will assure the Israelis security and stability; only a negotiated political settlement will bring peace and security." In other words, war is a practical plan for the Palestinians, but not for the Israelis.

The immediate goal is to gull Israel into a dishonest Saudi "peace plan" that would give Arafat his own independent state and force Israel to withdraw to its fragile pre-1967 borders, in exchange for an Arab promise to be nice -- the same kind of promise Arafat made in 1993. But these calls for a "political solution" also have a broader purpose: to keep Israel committed to the "peace process" -- the structure on which Arafat's war strategy is based.

Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, the alleged hawk, has proven to be a prisoner of the "peace process," responding to Palestinian attacks with a series of pin-prick retaliatory strikes against mostly empty Palestinian police buildings and political offices. Asked why he won't do more -- why he won't dismantle the Palestinian Authority and cut off terrorism at its source -- Sharon declares that he "will not drag Israel into an all-out war."

This answer is revealing, because it is obvious that the Palestinians are already at war with Israel. What Sharon really means is that Israel won't wage war in return. And that is what Arafat is counting on.

Terrorism is a form of warfare waged by the weak. Arafat knows that his Palestinian Authority would not survive for 48 hours in direct conflict with an unrestrained Israeli army. So instead, he wages war through semi-official proxies, through the militias and terrorist networks that he tolerates and supports. But this strategy can only work if Israel agrees not to recognize that this is war. Terrorism can only work against a victim who refuses to fight back.

What kind of country refuses to answer war with war? A country paralyzed by pacifism. For decades, Israel has been bombarded by the dogmas of the "peace movement" -- both from the Israeli left and from the acolytes of pacifism in the diplomatic community, especially in Europe. The fundamental dogma of the "peace movement" is that those who initiate a war and those who fight to defend themselves are equally guilty, that they are both responsible for a "cycle of violence" that can only be halted through negotiation and appeasement.

Thus, Arafat's strategy: unleash a terrorist war; use the "peace process" to keep Israel from fighting back; then terrorize Israel into a "political solution" that gives him more concessions and more territory -- which Arafat will use to launch a new war to eliminate Israel altogether.

What makes this war strategy work? Only one thing: the "peace movement."

The peacenik is the terrorist's best friend.


Robert Tracinski was a senior writer for the Ayn Rand Institute from 2000 to 2004. The Institute promotes the philosophy of Ayn Rand, author of Atlas Shrugged and The Fountainhead. Mr. Tracinski is editor and publisher of The Intellectual Activist and TIADaily, which offer daily news and analysis from a pro-reason, pro-individualist perspective. To receive a free 30-day trial of the TIA Daily and a FREE pdf issue of the Intellectual Activist please go to TIADaily.com and enter your email address.




 
Author Archives | Comment | Print | Email | Delicious | Digg | reddit | Facebook | StumbleUpon

Views expressed are author's and not necessarily CapMag's. Excerpts limited to 250 words, so long as a
hyperlink is provided to the original article. See our terms of use.

 

Capitalism Magazine Classics

"Francisco's Money Speech"

"So you think that money is the root of all evil?" said Francisco d'Anconia. "Have you ever asked what is the root of money?

End States That Sponsor Terrorism

Fifty years of increasing American appeasement in the Mideast have led to fifty years of increasing contempt in the Muslim world for the U.S. The climax was September 11, 2001.

Religion vs. Liberty
Secularism is not a sufficient condition for freedom--but a necessary one.

United Nations Declaration of Human Rights Destroys Individual Rights
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights is a charter of tyranny.

In Defense of the "Barbarous Relic"
Why The Enemies of Capitalism Smear The Gold Standard

Hatred of Western Civilization
Why Terrorists Attacked America

Repeal Sarbanes-Oxley
Treats Businessmen as Guilty Until Proven Innocent

Immigration and Individual Rights
Does a foreigner have a moral right to move to America? And should America welcome him?

A Tale of Two Novels
Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged Versus James Joyce's Ulysses

The New Right vs. Capitalism
The political right in America no longer stands for individual rights, limited government and capitalism.

The "Crony" in Russian "Capitalism" is Socialism
The fall of the Soviet Union in 1991 did not usher in capitalism. It merely replaced communism with socialism.

Israel Has A Moral Right To Its Life
Israel is America's frontline in the war on terrorism.

Moral Values Without Religion
The alternative to the dogmatism of the religious right and the emotionalism of the egalitarian left is a code of moral absolutes based on reason and individualism.

 

Related Articles on Terrorism:

Survival Optional

The Meaning of the Terrorist Attacks in Mumbai

Homeland Security or Homeland Pork?

Photo Op for Terrorism at Ground Zero

The Bush Administration's Latest Deadly Evasion

Creating Effective Incentives

Airport Security and Racial Profiling

Flying the Politically-Correct Skies

Mostafa Tabatabainejad and US Airways Flight 300 to Phoenix

How to Solve America's Terrorism Problem in 5 Easy Steps

Will The West Defend Itself?

Islamic Totalitarianism: Our Carry-On Luggage Is Not the Real Problem

Multiculturalism Breeds Terrorism

Reflections on The Death of Terrorist Abu Musab al-Zarqawi

The Death of Zarqawi: A Victory in the War on Terrorism

More Articles on Terrorism

 

Copyright 2009-1997 Capitalism Magazine. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
Terms of Use. Submissions