| |
|
|
Pluto, Democracy and Science
by Nicholas Provenzo
(January 5, 2007)
Science deals with truth and not feelings.
|
High School Physics: Grade F
by David Harriman
(November 2, 2006)
The irrational teaching of physics is detrimental to America's students.
|
Studies Prove: Part II
by Thomas Sowell
(August 10, 2006)
What is a mere meteorologist at M.I.T. compared to Al Gore and his movie?
|
Studies Prove: Part I
by Thomas Sowell
(August 8, 2006)
Many people who complain about the corrupting influence of money never seem to apply that to government money.
|
Where Science Ends and Faith Begins
by Nicholas Provenzo
(January 22, 2006)
'Intelligent design' is not science; it is faith, and it must be treated as such
|
Court Victory Against "Intelligent Design"
by Harry Binswanger
(December 25, 2005)
There was a significant defeat for the whole "Intelligent Design" movement today, when a Harrisburg, PA judge ruled against its being taught in the schools of a local school district.
|
The Killer Bug in the Space Shuttle
by Steven Brockerman
(October 21, 2005)
What were the lives of the Challenger and Columbia astronauts sacrificed for?
|
The Politics of Hurricanes and Global Warming
by Walter Williams
(October 3, 2005)
The politics of linking hurricanes to global warming threatens to undermine support for legitimate climate research and could result in ineffective hurricane policies.
|
"Intelligent Design": Religion Masquerading as Science
by Keith Lockitch
(September 27, 2005)
The central issue under debate is whether "intelligent design" is, in fact, a genuine scientific theory or merely a disguised form of religious advocacy--creationism in camouflage. Its advertising to the contrary notwithstanding, "intelligent design" is inherently a quest for the supernatural. No matter how fervently its salesmen wish "intelligent design" to be viewed as cutting-edge science, there is no disguising its true character. It is nothing more than a religiously motivated attack on science, and should be rejected as such.
|
Kant vs. Darwin: Creationism ("Intelligent Design") vs. Evolution is Philosophical Debate
by Don Watkins
(August 8, 2005)
As the evolution debate starts to stir once again, you might be wondering why a scientific question is of such concern to politicians, journalists, and religious leaders. The reason is that evolution versus creationism, or Darwinism versus Intelligent Design, is not a scientific debate (that debate has long been settled) -- it is a philosophical one.
|
| |
|
Next Article(s) >
|
|
|
 Recommended Reading:
Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal
by Ayn Rand
Whether you are one of capitalism's alleged champions (Conservatives,
Libertarians, etc.), or actually one of its defenders (a rarity in today's
culture), or a part of the "humanitarian" lynch mob that seeks to burn a straw
man, or just a curious observer -- read Ayn Rand's
Capitalism: The Unknown
Ideal -- and then judge for yourself. |
Capitalism News:
Keep up to date with the events on this site by subscribing to our
free email newsletter. |
| |
|
|
|
|
